<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Qurno Theme Review	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://perfectwpthemes.com/qurno-theme-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://perfectwpthemes.com/qurno-theme-review/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Oct 2024 12:22:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Elaina		</title>
		<link>https://perfectwpthemes.com/qurno-theme-review/#comment-472</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Elaina]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Oct 2024 12:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://perfectwpthemes.com/?p=1225#comment-472</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Very flexible theme with nice and clean design, well optimized for various devices. Super easy to customize. I am a frontend developer who knows JS, TS, React, and NextJS very well, can do design and CSS stuff myself as well but I prefer not spending time on that, hence I bought this template. I started my own NextJS project with Tina Markdown CMS and used this template only for design components.

Pros:
- Easy and quick to customize without even opening the documentation
- Good file structure and demo page
- Prepared for customization, very flexible
- Well optimized for various devices and browsers

Cons:
- Hasn&#039;t been migrated to app router yet
- No server-side rendering for fonts
- Based on Bootstrap which requires client-side loading of its JS scripts
- No TypeScript &#038; zero tests
- Some legacy code, especially in utils functions
- No localization support

Please note that I resolved all the cons myself, so I don&#039;t need any support with that. The one star down is for the extra work I needed to put in. Not a problem for me at all but wanted to mention it in case somebody cares, or as ideas for improvement. Good job, thanks for a nice theme!

Overall, the theme is very flexible and easy to customize, with a clean design and good optimization for various devices. However, there are some limitations, such as the lack of server-side rendering for fonts and reliance on Bootstrap, which requires client-side loading of its JS scripts. Despite these drawbacks, it’s a solid choice for those with NextJS experience.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very flexible theme with nice and clean design, well optimized for various devices. Super easy to customize. I am a frontend developer who knows JS, TS, React, and NextJS very well, can do design and CSS stuff myself as well but I prefer not spending time on that, hence I bought this template. I started my own NextJS project with Tina Markdown CMS and used this template only for design components.</p>
<p>Pros:<br />
&#8211; Easy and quick to customize without even opening the documentation<br />
&#8211; Good file structure and demo page<br />
&#8211; Prepared for customization, very flexible<br />
&#8211; Well optimized for various devices and browsers</p>
<p>Cons:<br />
&#8211; Hasn&#8217;t been migrated to app router yet<br />
&#8211; No server-side rendering for fonts<br />
&#8211; Based on Bootstrap which requires client-side loading of its JS scripts<br />
&#8211; No TypeScript &amp; zero tests<br />
&#8211; Some legacy code, especially in utils functions<br />
&#8211; No localization support</p>
<p>Please note that I resolved all the cons myself, so I don&#8217;t need any support with that. The one star down is for the extra work I needed to put in. Not a problem for me at all but wanted to mention it in case somebody cares, or as ideas for improvement. Good job, thanks for a nice theme!</p>
<p>Overall, the theme is very flexible and easy to customize, with a clean design and good optimization for various devices. However, there are some limitations, such as the lack of server-side rendering for fonts and reliance on Bootstrap, which requires client-side loading of its JS scripts. Despite these drawbacks, it’s a solid choice for those with NextJS experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
